"Ignorance of the law is no excuse"
.jpg)
December 19th, 2014 - Attorney General Eric Holder
has issued an edict, through a memorandum, that cross dressing and transsexualism
is now protected under federal civil rights laws
which were designed to protect women from sex discrimination. Existing federal
law provides no statutory support for treating cross-dressers and transsexuals
as the law treats female victims of discrimination.
Two Classes of Citizens (Supreme Court Cases)
14th Amendment Federal government civil rights citizen (Is a Privilege by the state i.e. Force Licence, Tax, Fees, Permits etc...)
vs. A State (sovereign) Citizens are endowed by their Creator with unalienable Rights (Rights comes from God vs. A State privilege)...
A Collection of Court Authorities
in re
Two Classes of Citizens
by
Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.
(All Rights Reserved without Prejudice)
Before the 14th amendment [sic] in 1868:
A citizen of any
one of the States of the union, is held to
be, and
called a citizen of the United States, although
technically
and abstractly there is no such thing.
To
conceive a citizen
of the United States who is not a citizen
of some one
of the States, is totally foreign to the idea,
and
inconsistent with the proper construction and common
understanding of
the expression as used in the Constitution,
which must
be deduced from its various other provisions.
The object then to
be attained, by the exercise of the power
of
naturalization, was to make citizens of the respective
States.
[Ex Parte Knowles, 5 Cal. 300 (1855)]
[bold emphasis added]
It is true, every
person, and every class and description of
persons, who
were at the time of the adoption of
the
Constitution recognized
as citizens in the several States,
became also
citizens of this new political body; but none
other;
it was formed by them, and for them and
their
posterity, but for
no one else. And the personal rights and
privileges
guarantied [sic] to citizens
of this new
sovereignty
were intended to embrace those only who were
then members of
the several state communities, or who should
afterwards,
by birthright or otherwise, become members,
according to
the provisions of the Constitution and the
principles on
which it was founded.
[Dred Scott v. Sandford, 19 How. 393, 404 (1856)]
[emphasis added]
... [F]or it is
certain, that in the sense in which the word
"Citizen" is
used in the federal Constitution, "Citizen of each
State," and "Citizen
of the United States***," are convertible
terms; they
mean the same thing; for "the Citizens of
each
State are entitled
to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens
in the several
States," and "Citizens of the United States***"
are, of course, Citizens of all
the United States***.
[44 Maine 518 (1859), Hathaway, J. dissenting]
[italics in original, underlines & C's added]
As it was the adoption of the Constitution by the
Conventions of
nine States that established and created the
United States***,
it is obvious there could not then have
existed any person
who had been seven years a citizen of the
United
States***, or who possessed the
Presidential
qualifications
of being thirty-five years of age, a natural
born
citizen, and fourteen years a resident of the United
States***.
The United States*** in these provisions, means
the
States united. To be twenty-five years of age, and
for
seven years
to have been a citizen of one of the States
which
ratifies the Constitution, is the qualification of a
representative.
To be a natural born citizen of one of the
States which
shall ratify the Constitution, or to be a
citizen
of one of said States at
the time of such
ratification,
and to have attained the age of thirty-five
years, and to have
been fourteen years a resident within one
of
the said States, are the Presidential
qualifications,
according to
the true meaning of the Constitution.
[People v. De La Guerra, 40 Cal. 311, 337 (1870)]
[bold and underline emphasis added]
After the 14th amendment [sic] in 1868:
It is quite clear,
then, that there is a citizenship of the
United States** and a
citizenship of a State, which are distinct
from each other and
which depend upon different characteristics
or circumstances in the
individual.
[Slaughter House Cases, 83 U.S. 36]
[(1873)
emphasis added]
The first
clause of the fourteenth amendment made
negroes
citizens of the
United States**, and citizens of the State in
which they reside,
and thereby created two classes of citizens,
one of the United States** and
the other of the state.
[Cory et al. v. Carter, 48 Ind. 327]
[(1874) headnote 8, emphasis added]
We have in our
political system a Government of the United
States** and a
government of each of the several States. Each
one of these
governments is distinct from the others, and each
has citizens of its own ....
[U.S. v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542]
[(1875)
emphasis added]
One may be a
citizen of a State and yet not a citizen of the
United States. Thomasson
v. State, 15 Ind. 449; Cory v. Carter,
48 Ind. 327 (17 Am.
R. 738); McCarthy v. Froelke, 63 Ind. 507;
In Re Wehlitz, 16 Wis. 443.
[McDonel v. State, 90 Ind. 320, 323]
[(1883)
underlines added]
citizen of the
particular state in which he resides. But
a
person may be a
citizen of a particular state and not a citizen
of the United States**.
To hold otherwise would be to deny to
the state the
highest exercise of its sovereignty, -- the right
to declare who are its
citizens.
[State v. Fowler, 41 La. Ann. 380]
[6 S. 602 (1889), emphasis added]
The first clause of
the fourteenth amendment of
the federal
Constitution made negroes
citizens of the United States**, and
citizens of the
state in which they reside, and thereby created
two classes of
citizens, one of the United States** and the other
of the state.
[4 Dec. Dig. '06, p. 1197, sec. 11]
["Citizens" (1906), emphasis added]
There are, then,
under our republican form of government, two
classes of
citizens, one of the United States** and one of the
state. One class of
citizenship may exist in a person, without
the other, as in
the case of a resident of the District of
Columbia; but both
classes usually exist in the same person.
[Gardina v. Board of Registrars, 160 Ala. 155]
[48 S. 788, 791 (1909), emphasis added]
There is a distinction between
citizenship of the United States**
and citizenship of
a particular state, and a person may be the
former without being the
latter.
[Alla v. Kornfeld, 84 F.Supp. 823]
[(1949) headnote 5, emphasis added]
A person may be a
citizen of the United States** and yet be not
identified or identifiable as a
citizen of any particular state.
[Du Vernay v. Ledbetter]
[61
So.2d 573, emphasis added]
... citizens of the
District of Columbia were not granted the
privilege of litigating
in the federal courts on the ground of
diversity of
citizenship. Possibly no better reason for this
fact exists than such
citizens were not thought of when the
judiciary article [III]
of the federal Constitution was drafted.
... citizens of the United
States** ... were also not thought of;
but in any event a
citizen of the United States**, who is not a
citizen of any state, is not
within the language of the [federal]
Constitution.
[Pannill v. Roanoke, 252 F. 910, 914]
[emphasis added]
# # #
Berg v. Obama et al. (September
15, 2008 A.D.)
Berg v. Obama et al. (October
14, 2008 A.D.)
to Consul General of Kenya in
Los Angeles (October 18, 2009 A.D.)
"Sedition by Syntax," by Ralph Schwan, The
Upright Ostrich (Dec/Jan 1985-86)
Videos
.jpg)
THE LOSS OF LIBERTY:
DECLARATION OF RIGHTS
Sec. 6. [Right to bear arms.]
The people have the right to bear arms for their security and defense, but
the Legislature may regulate the exercise of this right by law.
ARTICLE VIII
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Sec. 3. [Id. Qualification of judges.] Every Judge of the Supreme Court shall be at least thirty years of age, and, before his election, shall be a member of the bar, learned in the law, and a resident of the Territory or State of Utah for five years next preceding his election
Your "BAR" Attorney Is A Fraud
Your "BAR" Attorney Is A
Fraud. BAR stands for British Accreditation Registry. The British Legal
System Of Mixed Common And Roman Law ...
TAX YOU TO DEATH
ARTICLE XIII
REVENUE AND TAXATION
Sec. 12. [Stamp, income, license, franchise, or mortgage tax permissible.] Nothing in this Constitution shall be construed to prevent the Legislature from providing a stamp tax, or a tax based on income, occupation, licenses, franchises or mortgages.
HISTORY REPEATS
