Christian man fired after refusing to provide fingerprints (OR VACCINE)
The EEOC claims the company violated federal law when it fired
Harrington instead of accommodating his request not to be fingerprinted
due to his religion.
Shortly after Harrington informed APRS that having his fingerprints
captured was contrary to his religious practices, APRS fired him. The suit
claims the company did it before asking the client whether an exemption was
available as a religious accommodation.
The suit also claims that alternatives to fingerprinting are available.
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits
discrimination based on religion and requires employers to reasonably
accommodate an applicant’s or employee’s religious practice unless it would
pose an undue hardship.
The EEOC says it decided to sue after failing to reach an agreement with
the company.
"An employee should not have to choose
between his faith and his livelihood," said Gregory Gochanour, the EEOC’s
regional attorney in the Chicago District Office. "The EEOC is committed
to enforcing the rights of religious employees, and Title VII requires that an
employer attempt to find a workable solution when an employee’s sincerely held
religious observance or practice conflicts with a work requirement."
The suit seeks back pay for Harrington and other compensation.
https://www.fox5ny.com/news/christian-man-fired-after-refusing-to-provide-fingerprints
THE FIRST
CONSPIRACY
IN THE BIBLE
%20and%20The%20Poor.jpg)
%20unto%20God%20the%20things%20that%20are%20God's..jpg)
%20Heaven%20or%20Hell.jpg)
%20citizenship%20-%20John%20Quade%20(2).jpg)
%20unto%20God%20the%20things%20that%20are%20God's..jpg)
.jpg){kind=link}
%20Heaven%20or%20Hell.jpg){kind=link}
